A new Education Secretary: what Lucy Powell's appointment means for SEND

A new Education Secretary: what Lucy Powell's appointment means for SEND

Bridget Phillipson is out as Education Secretary. Lucy Powell, Labour's deputy leader, MP for Manchester Central and a former shadow education secretary, is in, appointed by new Prime Minister Andy Burnham as part of his first cabinet reshuffle. Phillipson stays in cabinet as Minister for Women and Equalities, but after two years in the DfE hot seat, she becomes the ninth Education Secretary to leave the role in the past decade. Powell is the tenth to hold it in ten years.

For a department that oversees the education of millions of children, that kind of churn is not a footnote. It's a pattern. And for the SEND community in particular, a change of leadership at exactly this moment lands with more weight than most reshuffles.

Why the timing matters

Phillipson's departure comes only months after her department published its long-awaited Schools White Paper, Every Child Achieving and Thriving, on 23 February 2026. The white paper set out the government's most significant proposed shake-up of SEND provision in years: a new layered, tiered system of support; legal Individual Support Plans for every child with SEND; a stated ambition to reserve EHCPs for the most complex needs by 2035; and £4 billion earmarked for mainstream inclusion over three years.

A consultation on the SEND proposals ran alongside the white paper and stays open until 18 May 2026. In other words, the reforms are still being shaped — and the person who now has to steer them through consultation, legislation and delivery is not the person who designed them.

That's not necessarily bad news. But it is a live question. Every new Secretary of State inherits their predecessor's in-tray, and the honest answer is that nobody outside Whitehall yet knows how closely Powell will hold to Phillipson's blueprint, where she might diverge, or how quickly she'll get up to speed on a brief this complex.

What we know about Lucy Powell's brief

Reporting since the reshuffle confirms Powell inherits responsibility for the SEND reform programme directly, alongside curriculum and assessment reform, the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act, and post-16 education. She's previously sat on the Commons Education Select Committee and served briefly as shadow education secretary under Jeremy Corbyn, so this isn't unfamiliar territory for her, but running the department is a different job to scrutinising it.

Sector reaction has been cautiously watchful rather than alarmed. Many school and college leaders' representative bodies have welcomed the white paper's ambition and the "commitment to finally grasping the nettle" on SEND reform, while pressing the new administration to go further on funding and support. That's the space Powell now has to operate in: real momentum on paper, real scepticism about delivery, and a system that families and schools alike already describe as under severe strain.

What we know about her policies and beliefs

Powell hasn't said anything on record yet about the SEND white paper specifically — she's inheriting Phillipson's consultation rather than having stated her own view on it. But a few things from her track record give some early signal of where she might land:

• A different instinct on academies. In her earlier stint as shadow education secretary, Powell argued that academies and free schools should return to local authority control. That's a notably different starting point from Phillipson's white paper, which pushed for all schools to move into trusts — worth watching if it resurfaces as reforms move toward legislation.
• Willing to break with the Treasury line. In February 2026, she criticised the Plan 2 student loan repayment system, calling its interest rates "unfair" and "egregious" — putting her at odds with Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has defended the current system as fair. It suggests someone prepared to push back publicly, even against her own government's position, when she disagrees.
• On taking the job, she's said there's "no more important job for any government" than making sure young people have the best education and opportunities — standard incoming-minister framing, and not much to read into yet.

None of this tells us how she'll handle SEND reform specifically. But the academies point in particular suggests she may not simply carry Phillipson's agenda forward unchanged, and that's the thread we'll be pulling on as more detail emerges.

What it means for families and SENCOs

For anyone navigating the SEND system right now — parents, carers, SENCOs, independent assessors — a change of Secretary of State doesn't reset the clock on current EHCP applications, tribunal timelines, or statutory duties. Local authorities' obligations haven't changed. The white paper hasn't become law. The consultation is still open.

What it does mean is a period of extra uncertainty layered on top of a system that already asks a great deal of the people trying to get the right support for their children. Ministerial transitions can slow decision-making inside the DfE while a new Secretary of State is briefed in, and they can also shift priorities in ways that only become visible months later, once a white paper moves toward legislation.

Our advice, as ever, is the same one we'd give regardless of who's in post: keep your evidence thorough, keep your paperwork current, and don't wait for policy certainty to advocate for what a child needs today. The reforms may eventually change the shape of the system. They haven't changed it yet.

Where this leaves the reform agenda

The stated direction of travel, earlier intervention, less reliance on tribunal-driven disputes, more support delivered locally and routinely rather than fought for, is one that most people working in SEND would recognise as the right ambition, even where they disagree on the detail or the pace. Whether Lucy Powell carries that agenda forward with the same energy, or reshapes it, is something we'll be watching closely over the coming months.

We'll keep tracking developments as the consultation closes and the reforms move, or don't move, toward legislation.

‍